E110 Advancing Dialogic Communication Skills through LLM-Based Simulation (Short paper) second conversation. In response to open-ended questions about their learning experience, participants identified four key benefits of the LLM-based training: (1) Increased Confidence – Students reported that verbalizing their research aloud helped them clarify their message and gain confidence; (2) Safe, Non-Judgmental Environment – The AI partner provided a low-stakes setting for practice; (3) Actionable Feedback – Feedback was perceived as helpful and directly applicable to improvement; (4) Research Benefits – Some students reported that the dialogue even helped them think about new ideas and directions for their research. This work provides an initial proof-of-concept that LLMs can effectively model dialogic interactions, support theoretically grounded feedback delivery, and facilitate communication skills improvement. References Akin, H., Rodgers, S., & Schultz, J. (2021). Science communication training as information seeking and processing: A theoretical approach to training early-career scientists. Journal of Science Communication, 20(5), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20050206 Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017). Science communication training: What are we trying to teach? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756 Baron, N. (2010). Escape from the ivory tower: A guide to making your science matter. Island Press. Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., & Storksdieck, M. (2015). Scientists’ views about communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21186 Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6. Chu, S. N., & Goodell, A. J. (2024). Synthetic Patients: Simulating Difficult Conversations with Multimodal Generative AI for Medical Education (No. arXiv:2405.19941). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.19941 Coletti, A., McGloin, R., Embacher-Martin, K., Hamlin, E., & Turner, M. (2023). Examining Oral Communication Skills in Communication Training Programs for STEM Professionals: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review. Science Communication, 45(6), 693-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231202773 Fischhoff, B. (2013). The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(supplement_3), 14033–14039. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110 Kerr, D., Ostaszkiewicz, J., Dunning, T., & Martin, P. (2020). The effectiveness of training interventions on nurses’ communication skills: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 89, 104405. Lewenstein, B. V., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2022). How should we organize science communication trainings to achieve competencies? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2136985 Reincke, C. M., Bredenoord, A. L., & Van Mil, M. H. (2020). From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists. EMBO Reports, 21(9), e51278. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051278 Worthington, D., Graham, B., Gilliard, H., & Kelp, N. C. (2024). Development of a Scale to Measure Planned Behavior in Inclusive Science Communication: Validity Evidence in Undergraduate STEM Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(4), ar48. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-01-0012
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mjk0MjAwOQ==