Yogev Shani, Idit Adler E93 Table 4. Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Talk-Turns Ack (%) Emb (%) Exp Ctx (%) Clfy (%) Elct (%) Trg End (%) Refl (%) Obs Pdg (%) Obs Stu (%) Exp Acn (%) Int (%) Amit 2 6 0 2 6 6 3 17 14 29 9 Ayala 0 0 2 0 0 0 11 8 6 32 13 Doron 0 4 1 0 0 0 9 18 18 38 16 Dvir 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 7 36 27 Harel 2 2 4 0 1 3 7 8 19 22 19 Ido 0 2 5 2 1 2 5 5 19 35 16 Inbal 3 6 4 4 3 10 8 6 18 21 23 Limor 0 0 0 0 3 0 18 16 5 42 8 Nasreen 0 0 3 0 2 6 2 6 19 39 2 Nadav 1 0 1 3 4 1 9 5 13 25 21 Ori 0 0 1 0 0 7 3 4 19 27 35 Orna 0 0 6 0 2 15 6 6 10 27 10 Ronen 0 6 3 1 3 4 15 7 13 19 28 Rotem 2 0 2 2 2 0 13 8 2 41 13 Shahar 0 0 3 0 0 3 12 12 0 41 9 Low-frequency codes included Acknowledge_PST and Embrace, indicating limited uptake of TeachPal’s feedback, Explain_Context, which suggests alternative scenarios, and Clarify_PST and Elicit_PST, which indicate proactive requests for guidance. In contrast, Reflection_PST appeared relatively often, though unevenly across PSTs. Observe_PST_Pedagogy and Observe_PST_Student were also common but varied across PSTs. Finally, Explain_Action and Intention, reflecting PSTs’ explanations and justifications of SRL-supportive practices, were frequent and consistent. TeachPal's Discourse with PSTs Table 5 presents code frequencies for TeachPal talk-turns during the Discussion Episodes in all four sessions for each PST. Percentages are calculated from the total number of TeachPal talk-turns
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mjk0MjAwOQ==